AI-generated image description: Table showing estimated effect of voter ID law changes from 2008 to 2012, listing turnout change and popular vote shift by state.

AI-extracted visible text:
Estimated Effect of Voter ID Law Changes, 2008-2012
State Turnout change Popular vote shift
Pennsylvania 2.4% decrease as share of registered voter population 1.2% net swing to Republican candidate
Kansas 2.4% decrease as share of registered voter population 1.2% net swing to Republican candidate
Idaho 1.6% decrease as share of registered voter population 0.8% net swing to Republican candidate
Tennessee 1.6% decrease as share of registered voter population 0.8% net swing to Republican candidate

Originally embedded in "Measuring the Effects of Voter Identification Laws", an article by Nate Silver: http://fivethirtyeight.com:80/features/measuring-the-effects-of-voter-identification-laws/

Original source URL: https://fivethirtyeight.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/15fivethirtyeight-id-law-table-custom111.png

AI disclosure: Image descriptions and visible-text extraction were generated using Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic.

plus-circle Add Review

comment

Reviews